Showing posts with label FIFA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FIFA. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

The Story Behind the Fall of Chelsea FC

As a Chelsea fan, I love Jose Mourinho. I still do. His return to the club was supposed to set up a period of stability for a club that, although successful, has experienced turbulence and a great amount of turnover in personnel.

Well.. not so much. Mourinho’s departure paves the way for yet another interim manager, Guus Hiddink, and yet another period of uncertainty for the club. This time, the interim manager has a legitimate hole to dig out of, as opposed to other managers, whom were simply the next man up when owner Roman Abramovich became impatient.

Chelsea are in 15th place. They are just three points above the relegation zone. The team probably overachieved last year when it won the Premier League, but this is a disgrace. I feel for Mourinho because he tried everything. Perhaps it was the success from last year, the issues with the team doctors, or the poor early results – but what transpired was a swooning spiral into 15th place.

I place a large amount of blame on Cesc Fabregas. It is clear that Fabregas has a problem with Mourinho, and although he was typically matter-of-fact with the press, and publically paid tribute to the manager after his departure, I don’t believe him. He’s lying.

When Mourinho was at Real Madrid, he benched Iker Casillas, the famed Spanish goalkeeper and poster boy of Real Madrid. He benched Casillas because he wasn’t the best goalkeeper on the team. It did not go well. Casillas was visibly upset, and Mourinho eventually left the club. Casillas did as well, because Mourinho was right – Casillas no longer should be starting for a club that is aspiring to win all trophies like Real Madrid. As a club legend, Casillas felt he was owed something, something that was not given to him when Mourinho put him on the bench.

Fabregas was taken off at halftime after a poor showing against West Ham, and subsequently benched against Liverpool. Chelsea lost both games. He was taken off, and benched, because he was playing pathetically and with little effort. If there is one thing Mourinho will not put up with, it's a lack of effort on the defensive side. Rumors started to surface of locker room tensions, and many were tied to Fabregas. He denied them, and although his words were direct, the tone was not. At this point, things at Chelsea started to take a real turn for the worse. More recently, rumors spread that Chelsea team information was leaked before their crucial tie against FC Porto. Guess who was sitting on the bench – Fabregas. Hmm..

It really seems like Fabregas, and the other Spanish players in the squad, decided they’d had enough of Mourinho. Spain won three international tournaments in a row – they did so by playing possession football and playing through the midfield. Mourinho’s style of play could not be more opposite – he demands you cover as a winger, and the general style is counterattacking, not possession. What you have here is a classic case of the players believing they are better than the manager.

Fabregas has been terrible all year. His typically smooth passing has been non-existent, which has rendered him a liability in midfield because he’s never been a good defender. Diego Costa came into training overweight, by his own admission, and has spent more time this season trying to instigate opposing defenders than actually getting around them. Yeah, it was funny when he got Gabriel to bite against Arsenal, but it’s not funny when you’re losing more than half of the games you play because the striker isn’t in the right position. His spoiled demeanor was evident when, although being the last member of the squad to be dropped, he threw his warmup bib at Mourinho after not being played against Tottenham. Costa has scored three goals this season – I don’t think anyone can see the crying as justified.

The two other Spanish members of the squad are different stories. Pedro came over from Barcelona over the summer and he just hasn’t been very good. I don’t question his effort, but his overall play has been poor. I thought he was a good bargain but it just hasn't worked out. It happens. Azpilicueta, on the other hand, has been horrible. The goal he gave up to Riyad Mahrez last Monday was laughable. Yeah, it was a nice move by Mahrez, but if you basically get out of the way of an in-form striker when he shoots from six yards out, what do you think will happen? I’ve always thought Azpilicueta was a hard worker, and that makes his recent lack of effort that much more noticeable. He isn’t trying, and neither are Fabregas and Costa. When three members of an eleven-man team, with one in each line of the formation, aren’t giving their full effort, what you get is a 15th placed team.

It isn’t only on the Spanish players. Eden Hazard has yet to score in the Premier League after legitimate comparisons were made between him and Cristiano Ronaldo last year. I think he just got sick of Mourinho telling him to track back, and when Fabregas started the trouble, he joined in. Hazard’s hip injury exit from Monday’s game in Leicester was dubious – you could tell by Mourinho’s tone that he didn’t really believe him. I doubt he’s really injured. When Mourinho said he was “betrayed” – look no further.

Mourinho is not without blame. Clearly, his style is to be authoritative, and he has a “my way or the highway” personality. In a lot of ways, this is a good characteristic for a football manager, because the squad must believe in the game plan or it will fail. He’s arrogant. He berates officials, managers, players, everyone he can. But who doesn’t? He’s always been in the spotlight because of his straight-shooting philosophy and his great successes. Mourinho is a top manager whether the Chelsea players see it that way or not.  

It’s hard to believe, but this Chelsea squad has too many primadonnas – more than Real Madrid – to succeed under Mourinho. The Spanish players are too arrogant from all of their international successes. Hazard does not want to defend like a winger, only attack. No matter how talented, a disjointed team cannot win a tough league like the Premier League. They can’t even beat a dreadful team like AFC Bournemouth. Although neither could Manchester United..

What should Chelsea do? It’s going to be difficult to attract a top manager before the end of the year, but Guus Hiddink isn’t a bad option for an interim coach. In January, they need to sign a striker who is a poacher – someone who is going to run into the six-yard box and finish from close. They will not get relegated, but a top-four finish is nearly impossible, so the season is lost. If they can somehow gather form by February, PSG awaits in the Champions League. It’s unlikely they will win that matchup – so it’s time to rebuild.

Step 1 – Remove Fabregas, Costa and Azpilicueta from the team. Sell Eden Hazard to Real Madrid.
Step 2 – Find a coach with an established pedigree at a top club, but also one that fits English football. While I would not be upset if Chelsea wound up with Pep Guardiola next year, I don’t think his style really fits the Premier League. Diego Simeone would be a great coach for the team. They need a motivator.
Step 3 – Give the youth players time to play. Once Chelsea are in a safer position in the table, bench all of the above players and play some of the promising youth players, such as Bertrand Traore and Ruben Loftus-Cheek. Show the players that they are not bigger than the club, and allow the talented youth to shine on the big stage. 

Jose Mourinho does not have a reputation to rebuild. These players do. Clearly, they will play better after his departure because they decided they were sick of him. In football, it’s much easier to fire one coach versus eleven players. Cesc Fabregas is impossible to root for as a Chelsea fan. He needs to go immediately. The rest of the players – their pride (in Mou’s words) is on the line for the rest of the year – to prove they are the world class players they pretended to be last year. Until some change occurs, the Chelsea players are right where they belong – 15th place.

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Weekly Rankings 10/12 - Germany Tops International Ranks; Netherlands Disappoints

Rankings

  1. Germany
  2. Chile
  3. Argentina
  4. Spain
  5. Belgium
  6. France
  7. Portugal
  8. Colombia
  9. Austria
  10. Brazil
  11. Italy
  12. Uruguay
  13. England
  14. Poland
  15. Côte d'Ivoire
  16. Wales
  17. Iceland
  18. Croatia
  19. Ghana
  20. Netherlands

Terms:

AFC – Asian soccer federation
CAF – African soccer federation
CONCACAF – North American soccer federation
CONMEBOL – South American soccer federation
UEFA – European soccer federation

News:

Let me first mention that FIFA’s actual “rankings” are ridiculous (perhaps a good representative of the organization itself). To summarize, they don’t take into account teams who are hosting major tournaments, and place way too much emphasis on meaningless qualifying games. If you’re looking at the official rankings and wondering why Wales is 8th and France is 22nd, there’s your answer..  No team from CONCACAF makes my rankings. The United States used to be worthy, but their Gold Cup performance was just plain awful. You could see the loss to Mexico coming – the team doesn’t deserve a place in the Confederations Cup, and you aren’t a top-20 team if you lose to Jamaica in a big game. Mexico is still a mess, despite the win. Costa Rica is the only other possible candidate – they too were poor in the Gold Cup. Years of corruption in the FIFA hierarchy (i.e. Jack Warner) has made headlines, but its effect on stunting the growth of CONCACAF is clear.. Not willing to give any team from AFC a spot either. Australia and Japan have been the best two teams in the region for quite some time, but neither made any kind of dent at the World Cup last year. South Korea also failed to make an impact, and with Iran rounding out the region’s qualifiers, the results were four last-place finishes for AFC.  It’s an area lacking in star power and depth. Asia has some of the worst teams in the world despite having massive populations, as countries like India and China are pathetic on the field. There is the most room for growth in AFC, but it hasn’t even begun its liftoff yet.

European qualifiers are nearly concluded, with only tomorrow’s matches remaining. I wrote previously about how the expansion from a 16-team final tournament to 24 teams would raise the quality of play in qualifying matches (10/14: New European Qualifying Structure Paying Quick Dividends), and the results are quite staggering. Iceland, Northern Ireland, Wales, Albania and Slovakia all qualified for their first-ever tournament, while Austria also qualified for the first time (they were co-hosts in 2008, and were automatically in). There are six pots to rank teams from best to worst, and Wales came from Pot 4, while Iceland, Northern Ireland and Albania came from Pot 5. For reference, 2012 qualifying’s lowest-ranked team to qualify was Ireland, who was in Pot 3. The last team to qualify from the fourth pot or lower was Latvia in 2004, when there were only five pots. Granted, more spots in the finals means more opportunities for lower-ranked nations, but the expansion of the Euros has not only improved competitiveness, but allowed football to grow more quickly and gain more attention in smaller countries. The move has been a clear bright spot during a dark, turbulent period for UEFA and FIFA.

As for the rankings, World Champions Germany top the list, just as their counterparts Bayern Munich do for the club rankings. Last week’s loss to Ireland was a black mark, certainly, but given the busy club schedules at this time and the cushion Germany had in Group D, it was forgivable. There is no deeper team in the world – Germany’s “B” team would likely be a top-15 side. They will be favorites next summer to win Euro 2016.. Chile logged an impressive win over Brazil to take the initiative in CONMEBOL qualifying. This should not come as a surprise, despite it being Chile’s first win over their counterparts in fifteen years. Brazil will be better when Neymar returns; for now, they are barely a top-10 side.. Argentina played horribly in a 2-0 defeat to Ecuador and lost Sergio Aguero in the process. Sadly, at this point we must expect Aguero to get hurt because it seems to happen so frequently. He should miss over a month of play this time. Despite the poor performance, Argentina will be fine without him – it is a much greater concern for Manchester City.

Winners from Euro qualifiers? The United Kingdom and Ireland, which could see four of their five teams in France next summer. England, Northern Ireland and Wales are already qualified, while Ireland head to the playoffs. Only Scotland will certainly miss out, as a loss in Georgia proved a fateful blow to their campaign. Wales are certainly not as good as their lofty FIFA ranking, but Gareth Bale and Aaron Ramsey could take the team a long way. The Welsh could make some noise in France. England are good, of course, but not great. More of the same should be expected.. Austria have been one of the shining stars of qualifying. Seemingly packed with expectation year after year, the young Austrian side finally came through, winning Group G easily while dropping just two points in a home draw with Sweden. Full of crafty midfielders, Austria will be a sleeper candidate.. If there was a wins-above-replacement statistic for soccer, then Robert Lewandowski would certainly top it after his performances for Bayern and Poland this season. The man is simply unstoppable. His thirteen goals easily led all scorers in qualifying, and there appears to be no way to contain him. Poland’s biggest problem is that the final tournament is a whole year away. He can take what is an above-average team (at best) and make them elite..  Despite all the buzz around the newcomers for Euro 2016, we will likely be missing one continental power as the Netherlands completely fell apart in Group A. The Dutch lost to each of the three sides ahead of them away from home, including being swept by Iceland. This is a team that usually breezes through qualifying, and Group A was not particularly difficult. It will be stunning if the Dutch miss out on France, but thoroughly deserved.. Portugal lost their first match at home to Albania before rattling off seven straight mostly-unimpressive one-goal wins to win Group I. An always-talented but inconsistent side, Portugal will go to France with perhaps Cristiano Ronaldo’s last hope of winning the Euros. While Ronaldo rightly deserves praise as the best Portugese player of all-time, it is unlikely he is rewarded with a major trophy. Portugal has matched nearly every big win with a puzzling loss over the last fifteen years.

Games to Watch:

Tuesday: Euro 2016 qualifying concludes, with a number of deciding matches on tap for both automatic qualification to France and qualification to the playoff round. Tuesday’s games are highlighted by Turkey – Iceland, Cyprus – Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Italy – Norway. Turkey only need a point to qualify for the playoffs as they own the head-to-head with the Netherlands, who take on the Czechs needing a win and a ton of help from Iceland. Turkey should be heading to the playoffs, although they were beaten handily by Iceland in Reykjavik. Cyprus host Bosnia with possibly the unlikeliest bid to qualify for the playoffs. Two points behind their opponents entering the day, Cyprus need a win and an Israel loss or draw in Belgium. Cyprus, who are a mediocre side at best, won in Bosnia before going 2-5 over their next seven matches, only managing to beat minnows (me being kind) Andorra twice. But a win last week in Israel gives them an improbable hope of making the playoffs, as Bosnia has stumbled throughout the campaign and Israel just isn’t very good. I would expect Bosnia to take care of business – they are a much better side and playing better after a nightmare start. Lastly, Norway can qualify for their first major tournament since 2000 by beating Italy, as Croatia will almost certainly beat Malta. Only a win will do, as Croatia won the head-to-head between the two sides.

In South America, Uruguay and Colombia face off in Montevideo. Both teams won their first qualifier, with Uruguay winning in Bolivia and Colombia defeating Peru. Both sides play a physical style and have elite attacking players. Brazil and Argentina are still filled with stars but aren’t the most entertaining teams on the continent now-a-days – these two, along with Chile, are. Hopefully no bites or back-breaking tackles, though.

Saturday: Club football returns, and Tottenham – Liverpool will be the matchup to watch Saturday morning in England. Liverpool hired Jurgen Klopp to replace the struggling Brendan Rodgers, as even a draw in the Merseyside derby was not enough to save Rodgers from receiving the axe. Tottenham provides a solid first test for Klopp, who is one of the best coaches in the world. His last year at Dortmund is not indicative of his abilities, and with a talented but underperforming squad, he could steer the ship back on course quickly. He has already tempered expectations and will need to sign some of his own type of players, but Liverpool should rejoin the “let’s take them seriously” conversation much sooner with Klopp at the helm.

Sunday: Many of the top club teams are missing a marquee matchup this weekend, but there is some interesting action in Italy and Spain. In Italy, Napoli – Fiorentina and Inter Milan – Juventus should be very good matches, while Villarreal takes on Celta Vigo in Spain.  Napoli have won five of six matches (the only draw a puzzling 0-0 result against newly-promoted Carpi) while logging an extraordinary 18:1 goal differential. That run includes a 2-1 win over Juventus and a 4-0 spanking of AC Milan. The hottest team in Serie A, they take on leaders Fiorentina, who are six points ahead but still proving themselves as contenders. Inter are in second place, and will have their hands full with reigning but out-of-form champions Juventus. I’m expecting Juventus to start closing that gap on Inter and Fiorentina, and it should start on Sunday with wins for the “Old Lady” and Napoli.

Monday, June 1, 2015

FIFA's Ugly Corruption is Deeply Seeded



The FIFA corruption headlines come as a surprise. It’s not because the bribing, racketeering and money laundering, among other types of corruption, were hidden from the public. It’s because national governments finally took the long-needed action to crack down on what is possibly the most corrupt international organization in the world. For decades, FIFA has been run in a manner that takes advantage of the large football audience to benefit a select few people, and in some cases, countries. The biggest question that remains is: will the arrests finally bring about any change in FIFA?

FIFA, if run properly, should be a heralded organization – one that is known for growing and improving the quality of football internationally. As with any organization, the people running it must be morally sound, and officials must truly have the best interests of the game in their heart. While it is also a business, a fan of the game would hope that FIFA would emphasize the development and quality of the game as much as possible.

Instead, FIFA is run on cash alone. Officials in all regions of the world – but especially in the least developed ones – have requested and/or accepted bribes for decades. It has become commonplace. Jack Warner, one of the men arrested on Wednesday, is one of the worst offenders. Warner became president of CONCACAF, which covers North American countries large and small, in 1990. Warner’s presidency was filled with positives, including the first World Cup in the United States, the rise of many CONCACAF teams from irrelevance to the international stage, and a parabolic increase in revenue for the confederation. His home country, Trinidad & Tobago, qualified for their lone World Cup in 2006. However, it was clear that Warner was actively accepting bribes or requesting them in order to gain his cooperation. He resigned from FIFA in 2011 after many of the allegations against him garnered full attention of the media, and of FIFA’s ethics committee (yes, they do have one).

So when Warner resigned, what happened to the investigation? FIFA ended it. They chose to let him go without further charges (minus banning him for life from football activities, which is meaningless) and although they have never paid his pension, they allowed Warner to avoid a criminal investigation, which is thankfully coming now. Here are some of the allegations against Warner:

  • ·         Profiting over $1 million through indirect ticket sales for the 2006 World Cup that were supposed to be done on behalf of the Trinidad & Tobago (T&T) FA
  • ·         Attempting to collect payments made to the T&T FA into his own account
  • ·         Requested funds (in the millions) in order to support England’s 2018 World Cup bid
  • ·         Funds intended for Haitian earthquake relief were paid into a bank account controlled by Warner
  • ·         Concealment of his ownership of land that CONCACAF built a $25 million development upon

This is not to mention that Warner’s two sons have already pleaded guilty to fraud conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, and the structuring of financial transactions. It’s one thing to be greedy and selfish (not good), but it’s another thing entirely to steal money from people in your own country, especially when those funds are meant to further develop the youth and sport within it. Not to mention that Warner recently quoted satirical newspaper “The Onion” when defending himself. CONCACAF’s former representative has not only been gluttonous and dishonest, but also incredibly incompetent and arrogant. T&T hasn’t come close to qualifying for a World Cup since 2006. Should this be a major surprise?

The center of the spotlight on this investigation lies around the 2018 and 2022 World Cups. It seems both illogical and impractical that Russia and Qatar would be awarded those World Cups, respectively, and while Russia was not invading Ukraine when the bid was awarded, it was still a surprising outcome. However, despite the political issues, Russia has the infrastructure and full capability of hosting a World Cup. The Qatar story is completely different. Allegations of bribes were present from the beginning, because how else could Qatar get the World Cup? The average temperature in June is 111 degrees Fahrenheit, and the country has never been to a World Cup (or made it close to qualifying). None of the stadiums needed for the event had been built yet. It obviously doesn’t make sense. There will be a time when we have the technology to have a legitimate World Cup in Qatar - right now it's irresponsible. It will almost certainly come out that officials took bribes, probably in the millions of dollars, to support the Qatar World Cup. Whether FIFA will revote on the bids is still up in the air, but it should. The Qatar World Cup is unsafe for the players and irresponsible given the controversy not only surrounding the bid, but the human rights violations pertaining to the stadium workers. If FIFA had the best interests of the sport in mind, the bid never would have been awarded.

FIFA has done nothing but hold back the sport from further development. The president, Sepp Blatter, is the face of this corruption. That begs the question – why was Blatter reelected?

It’s a simple but disturbing answer. Each country gets a single vote in the election, so there can be no bias towards one region. Most football associations partake in crooked practices. Blatter’s departure would likely bring about sweeping change, as well as more attention to past corruption. Because the corruption within FIFA is so widespread, football associations, especially those in poorer, less governed regions, would prefer Blatter stay in charge so that they can avoid more scrutiny. Instead of embracing the opportunity for change, it is clear that most associations would rather be corrupt – it is more profitable that way. I have yet to see a breakdown of the votes – I have a feeling they are not published – but I would wager that most of UEFA, the United States, and Middle Eastern countries were Prince Ali’s supporters. These associations have their own interests in mind as well, but clearly, the corruption is so layered throughout the system that it can’t change on its own.

This is the sad state that FIFA is in. It is a true reflection of leadership, and Blatter’s defiant comments about a witch hunt targeting him show how out of touch with reality he is. He can’t fix FIFA. He IS this FIFA. And this FIFA is stunting the growth of the game. Football associations are exploiting their own players and doing so for personal profit. While Blatter may not be directly involved with much of the corruption, he is responsible as president. Since the associations have grown so corrupt that they won’t vote him out, it’s now up to the authorities to trigger a change in the organization.

Regardless of the outcome of these first arrests, stay tuned to the FIFA story. It’s going to evolve and get much, much bigger. Hopefully, when the investigation concludes, FIFA can actually achieve its purpose of enriching and spreading the beautiful game. It clearly can’t fix itself. 

Because this is only one issue. Two words: match fixing. That could be even worse. Again, stay tuned.