Monday, June 1, 2015

FIFA's Ugly Corruption is Deeply Seeded



The FIFA corruption headlines come as a surprise. It’s not because the bribing, racketeering and money laundering, among other types of corruption, were hidden from the public. It’s because national governments finally took the long-needed action to crack down on what is possibly the most corrupt international organization in the world. For decades, FIFA has been run in a manner that takes advantage of the large football audience to benefit a select few people, and in some cases, countries. The biggest question that remains is: will the arrests finally bring about any change in FIFA?

FIFA, if run properly, should be a heralded organization – one that is known for growing and improving the quality of football internationally. As with any organization, the people running it must be morally sound, and officials must truly have the best interests of the game in their heart. While it is also a business, a fan of the game would hope that FIFA would emphasize the development and quality of the game as much as possible.

Instead, FIFA is run on cash alone. Officials in all regions of the world – but especially in the least developed ones – have requested and/or accepted bribes for decades. It has become commonplace. Jack Warner, one of the men arrested on Wednesday, is one of the worst offenders. Warner became president of CONCACAF, which covers North American countries large and small, in 1990. Warner’s presidency was filled with positives, including the first World Cup in the United States, the rise of many CONCACAF teams from irrelevance to the international stage, and a parabolic increase in revenue for the confederation. His home country, Trinidad & Tobago, qualified for their lone World Cup in 2006. However, it was clear that Warner was actively accepting bribes or requesting them in order to gain his cooperation. He resigned from FIFA in 2011 after many of the allegations against him garnered full attention of the media, and of FIFA’s ethics committee (yes, they do have one).

So when Warner resigned, what happened to the investigation? FIFA ended it. They chose to let him go without further charges (minus banning him for life from football activities, which is meaningless) and although they have never paid his pension, they allowed Warner to avoid a criminal investigation, which is thankfully coming now. Here are some of the allegations against Warner:

  • ·         Profiting over $1 million through indirect ticket sales for the 2006 World Cup that were supposed to be done on behalf of the Trinidad & Tobago (T&T) FA
  • ·         Attempting to collect payments made to the T&T FA into his own account
  • ·         Requested funds (in the millions) in order to support England’s 2018 World Cup bid
  • ·         Funds intended for Haitian earthquake relief were paid into a bank account controlled by Warner
  • ·         Concealment of his ownership of land that CONCACAF built a $25 million development upon

This is not to mention that Warner’s two sons have already pleaded guilty to fraud conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, and the structuring of financial transactions. It’s one thing to be greedy and selfish (not good), but it’s another thing entirely to steal money from people in your own country, especially when those funds are meant to further develop the youth and sport within it. Not to mention that Warner recently quoted satirical newspaper “The Onion” when defending himself. CONCACAF’s former representative has not only been gluttonous and dishonest, but also incredibly incompetent and arrogant. T&T hasn’t come close to qualifying for a World Cup since 2006. Should this be a major surprise?

The center of the spotlight on this investigation lies around the 2018 and 2022 World Cups. It seems both illogical and impractical that Russia and Qatar would be awarded those World Cups, respectively, and while Russia was not invading Ukraine when the bid was awarded, it was still a surprising outcome. However, despite the political issues, Russia has the infrastructure and full capability of hosting a World Cup. The Qatar story is completely different. Allegations of bribes were present from the beginning, because how else could Qatar get the World Cup? The average temperature in June is 111 degrees Fahrenheit, and the country has never been to a World Cup (or made it close to qualifying). None of the stadiums needed for the event had been built yet. It obviously doesn’t make sense. There will be a time when we have the technology to have a legitimate World Cup in Qatar - right now it's irresponsible. It will almost certainly come out that officials took bribes, probably in the millions of dollars, to support the Qatar World Cup. Whether FIFA will revote on the bids is still up in the air, but it should. The Qatar World Cup is unsafe for the players and irresponsible given the controversy not only surrounding the bid, but the human rights violations pertaining to the stadium workers. If FIFA had the best interests of the sport in mind, the bid never would have been awarded.

FIFA has done nothing but hold back the sport from further development. The president, Sepp Blatter, is the face of this corruption. That begs the question – why was Blatter reelected?

It’s a simple but disturbing answer. Each country gets a single vote in the election, so there can be no bias towards one region. Most football associations partake in crooked practices. Blatter’s departure would likely bring about sweeping change, as well as more attention to past corruption. Because the corruption within FIFA is so widespread, football associations, especially those in poorer, less governed regions, would prefer Blatter stay in charge so that they can avoid more scrutiny. Instead of embracing the opportunity for change, it is clear that most associations would rather be corrupt – it is more profitable that way. I have yet to see a breakdown of the votes – I have a feeling they are not published – but I would wager that most of UEFA, the United States, and Middle Eastern countries were Prince Ali’s supporters. These associations have their own interests in mind as well, but clearly, the corruption is so layered throughout the system that it can’t change on its own.

This is the sad state that FIFA is in. It is a true reflection of leadership, and Blatter’s defiant comments about a witch hunt targeting him show how out of touch with reality he is. He can’t fix FIFA. He IS this FIFA. And this FIFA is stunting the growth of the game. Football associations are exploiting their own players and doing so for personal profit. While Blatter may not be directly involved with much of the corruption, he is responsible as president. Since the associations have grown so corrupt that they won’t vote him out, it’s now up to the authorities to trigger a change in the organization.

Regardless of the outcome of these first arrests, stay tuned to the FIFA story. It’s going to evolve and get much, much bigger. Hopefully, when the investigation concludes, FIFA can actually achieve its purpose of enriching and spreading the beautiful game. It clearly can’t fix itself. 

Because this is only one issue. Two words: match fixing. That could be even worse. Again, stay tuned.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

New European Qualifying Structure Paying Quick Dividends



The European Championships are UEFA’s flagship competition in international football. After five competitions with 16 teams, the field is being expanded to 24 teams for the 2016 tournament. There has been severe backlash from areas of the continent, suggesting that the competition will be watered down with the addition of eight more teams. I think the positives outweigh the negatives, and the change is already paying off.

Whenever a tournament has been expanded in sports, there are two sides of the argument. One side will suggest that the additional teams bolster the competition by adding more games and creating a more competitive and unpredictable tournament. The extra games allow for more participants to be involved and increases the revenue generated by the event. Opponents suggest that having more games makes it harder for the truly elite teams to succeed by presenting unworthy competition the opportunity to take a final shot in the tournament. In this scenario, the “best” team has a lesser chance of winning because of the increased amount of games, diluting the competition’s quality. For example, in the case of the NCAA’s basketball tournament, I am a firm opponent of expanding the tournament. I feel that the teams who don’t get in had plenty of chances to prove themselves, and expanding the tournament would water down the competition so much that the regular season would not matter. In the European Championships, I see the opposite effect.

In the previous format, just 16 of 54 associations would be allowed to participate in the final tournament – a total of 29.6%. The host (or occasionally co-hosts) automatically qualifies, taking away one or two spots from qualifiers. That pushes the percentage of qualifiers to reach the finals down (with one host) to 28.3%. This year, with France as host, 43.4% of the qualifiers will reach the final tournament. This should benefit competition in the groups and overall parity across the continent. Teams who were drawn from Pot 4 and Pot 5 had virtually no chance in the previous format – the eight group winners often come from Pot 1 or 2, while second place would not even guarantee a place in the finals, but a place in the playoffs against a higher-ranked opponent. Now, players for countries like Wales and Iceland can have a real motivation to compete because they have a chance. In the first match day alone, we saw Albania (Pot 5) defeat Portugal (Pot 1), Iceland (Pot 5) defeat Turkey (Pot 3), Cyprus (Pot 5) defeat Bosnia-Herzegovina (Pot 1), Northern Ireland (Pot 5) defeat Hungary (Pot 2), and Scotland (Pot 4) lose 2-1 to World Champions Germany. On the second match day, Kazakhstan, from the lowest pot in the draw (Pot 6), led the Dutch at halftime. Obviously, these results are not expected to continue and the top sides will regain their form, but I see the extra motivation for the minnows as the primary reason for these historic scorelines.

Let’s take a quick look at Montenegro. A Pot 5 side in the last European qualifiers, the tiny Balkan country surprised by snatching second-place from Switzerland by a point. Their unlikely qualification for the playoffs was swiftly met with a playoff against 11th ranked Czech Republic, who beat the Montenegrins 3-0 on aggregate. Did Montenegro deserve a place in the finals? Probably not, but their improvement gave the side something to build upon going into the next qualifiers. This time, their group is much tougher, with Russia, Sweden and Austria joining them in fighting for three spots. That group has already been electric – those four sides are separated by just three points. With just one automatic qualification spot available in the previous format, one of the four teams would likely be out of the mix before the end, lessening the quality of their remaining fixtures. With two teams advancing and a third gaining a playoff spot, all four teams will likely be in it until the end.

I don’t think the 24-team final tournament compromises the competition at all. Apart from Greece’s victory in Portugal 2004, which was a 16-team format, there has not been a major shock winner in international football. I also don’t see a major gap between the sides currently ranked 13-16 and the sides right below them. Ukraine (10), Sweden (13), and Denmark (14) strike me as marginally better, at best, than the Czechs (17), Ireland (19) and Turkey (21). There will hardly be a massive drop off in quality. Will there be a low-ranked side in the finals? Most likely, but again, this is not news. In the World Cup, eight sides ranked 33 or lower (since the World Cup, in theory, should be the top 32 teams) qualified for the finals. Only one team, Nigeria, advanced out of the group stage, and they were eliminated by France in the Round of 16. That is what usually happens to bad teams – they lose. I see no problem having more teams involved in the group stage. 

Lastly, it changes the way that European footballers look at international qualifying. It gives the opportunity for players to 1) play for their home country versus gravitating towards an eligible country to play for a better team and 2) individually lift their country on the big stage. Wales is my most obvious example – they are hardly a one-man team, but the star of the show is clearly Gareth Bale. Given that UEFA has 13 places in the World Cup, it’s unlikely Bale’s Wales would ever qualify, and with just three more places in the Euros previously, they didn’t have much of a chance either as they are currently stuck in Pot 4. However, with the additional places, Bale has the potential to push the team into the tournament and light up the continental stage. How many times have you seen a player raise his game to push his team past a better opponent? They may not all make it, but now the continent’s best players will at least have the opportunity to qualify. In the end, we could have a tournament featuring players like Bale, Robert Lewandowski, Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Cristiano Ronaldo, and David Alaba, none of whom are on the continent’s best teams. Plus two-time defending champions Spain, and World Champions Germany. Who would turn that off?

The change is already paying off. We’ve seen a number of upsets already, and the games are generally closer. Going forward, it’s hard to see teams like Germany and the Netherlands running a near-perfect slate through qualifying. This change to the rules has made the qualifying process more competitive, and should make European teams better on the global stage.

Through three match days, I list the group leaders. Just one team from the first pot currently leads their group – that really says it all.

Group A – Iceland
Group B – Wales
Group C – Slovakia
Group D – Poland
Group E – England
Group F – Northern Ireland
Group G – Austria
Group H – Croatia
Group I – Denmark

Not exactly your world powers? 

PS: The abandonment of the Serbia - Albania game today was the most foreseeable cancellation for quite some time. Why they are even playing each other is beyond me.